Government of Gujarat vs CHAUDHARI NIKULKUMAR BHAGABHAI — 46/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPT020000592026

Filing Number

46/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

46/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217019250364

Police Station

A DIVISION POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHAUDHARI NIKULKUMAR BHAGABHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted defendant Chaudhary Nikulkumar Bhagabhai under IPC Section 223 (breach of public notice) after he voluntarily admitted guilt. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500, with three days simple imprisonment as an alternative, considering his economic hardship as the sole earner of his family and that this was his first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 46/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted defendant Chaudhary Nikulkumar Bhagabhai under IPC Section 223 (breach of public notice) after he voluntarily admitted guilt. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500, with three days simple imprisonment as an alternative, considering his economic hardship as the sole earner of his family and that this was his first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case