Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR VIJAYJI DASHRATHJI — 18/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),116-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPT020000272026
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
01-Jan-2026
Registration No
18/2026
Registration Date
01-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT PATAN
Judge
11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217019250361
Police Station
A DIVISION POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAKOR VIJAYJI DASHRATHJI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65-A and 116-B for possessing four bottles of foreign liquor worth ₹372/-. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and the court, considering his poor financial condition and family responsibilities, imposed a lenient sentence of ₹300 fine or two days simple imprisonment instead of the maximum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 18/2026
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65-A and 116-B for possessing four bottles of foreign liquor worth ₹372/-. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and the court, considering his poor financial condition and family responsibilities, imposed a lenient sentence of ₹300 fine or two days simple imprisonment instead of the maximum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts