Government of Gujarat vs RAVAL AKASH URFE AKKU RASIKBHAI KANJIBHAI Advocate - S D SIYOLA — 74/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),64(2)(M),65(1),87,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJPT010033242024

Filing Number

74/2024

Filing Date

26-Dec-2024

Registration No

74/2024

Registration Date

26-Dec-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

4-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217009240837

Police Station

HARIJ POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),64(2)(M),65(1),87,54
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4(2),5(L),6,11(4),17

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. J J BAROT, S P RAVAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVAL AKASH URFE AKKU RASIKBHAI KANJIBHAI Advocate - S D SIYOLA

  2. 2.VAGHARI(VAGHELA) AKSHAY DASHRATHBHAI KARSHNABHAI

    Adv. S D SIYOLA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Special Court (POCSO) in Patan acquitted both accused in a sexual abuse case, finding the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident. The court held that the victim's consent and voluntary relationship with accused #1 negated the charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1), 54 and POCSO Act Sections 4(2), 5(L), 6, 11(4), 17. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  9. 20-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl District Judge

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl District Judge

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl District Judge

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  13. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  15. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  16. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  17. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  19. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  20. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  21. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  22. 29-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  23. 15-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  24. 01-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  25. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  26. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  27. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  28. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  29. 19-Mar-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  30. 05-Mar-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  31. 19-Feb-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  32. 13-Feb-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  33. 29-Jan-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  34. 22-Jan-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  35. 08-Jan-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  36. 01-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 26-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Court (POCSO) in Patan acquitted both accused in a sexual abuse case, finding the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident. The court held that the victim's consent and voluntary relationship with accused #1 negated the charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1), 54 and POCSO Act Sections 4(2), 5(L), 6, 11(4), 17. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case