THAKOR RANJUBEN RAGHUVIRJI(Legal Heir) vs DRIVER OF MOTOR CYCLE NO GJ 24 AR 9199 PRAJAPATI KALPESJKUMAR AMRATLAL Advocate - A M THAKKAR — 249/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJPT010032012024

Filing Number

249/2024

Filing Date

12-Dec-2024

Registration No

249/2024

Registration Date

12-Dec-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR RANJUBEN RAGHUVIRJI(Legal Heir)

    Adv. B V BHARWAD1.

  2. 2.THAKOR RAGHUVIRJI MAGANJI

    Adv. B V BHARWAD1.

  3. 3.MINOR THAKOR JASMINBEN RAGHUVIRJI FNG APPLICANT NO 1

    Adv. B V BHARWAD1.

  4. 4.MINOR DIPIKABEN RAGHUVIRJI FNG APPLICANT NO 11

    Adv. B V BHARWAD1.

  5. 5.MINOR THAKOR ANJALI RAGHUVIRJI FNG APPLICANT NO 1

    Adv. B V BHARWAD1.

  6. 6.MINOR THAKOR PRINCE RAGHUVIRJI FNG APPLICANT NO 1

    Adv. B V BHARWAD1.

  7. 7.MINOR THAKOR SHRADDHA RAGHUVIRJI FNG APPLICANT NO 1

    Adv. B V BHARWAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DRIVER OF MOTOR CYCLE NO GJ 24 AR 9199 PRAJAPATI KALPESJKUMAR AMRATLAL Advocate - A M THAKKAR

  2. 2.INSURANCE COMPANY OF MOTOR CYCLE NO GJ 24 AR 9199 HDFC EGRO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

    Adv. H N PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (M.A.C.T.) in Patan recorded a compromise settlement between the applicant and HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd. for Rs. 24,50,000 as full and final compensation. The court directed that an award be drawn in terms of the compromise, with disbursement to follow after deposit of the amount, and exempted the applicant from paying any deficit court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  10. 01-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  11. 04-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  12. 20-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  13. 09-Oct-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  15. 21-Aug-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  16. 28-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  17. 20-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  18. 06-May-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  19. 21-Mar-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  20. 17-Feb-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  21. 08-Jan-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  22. 27-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 12-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 249/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (M.A.C.T.) in Patan recorded a compromise settlement between the applicant and HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd. for Rs. 24,50,000 as full and final compensation. The court directed that an award be drawn in terms of the compromise, with disbursement to follow after deposit of the amount, and exempted the applicant from paying any deficit court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case