MANKNOJIYA SAFVANBHAI ABBASBHAI vs TRAVELS VEHICLE NO A.R. 01 T 3051 CHAUDHARI DHARMENDRA DEVARAM — 816/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33,151. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJPT010031942025

Filing Number

816/2025

Filing Date

30-Dec-2025

Registration No

816/2025

Registration Date

30-Dec-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 33,151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANKNOJIYA SAFVANBHAI ABBASBHAI

    Adv. A J SUVASARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TRAVELS VEHICLE NO A.R. 01 T 3051 CHAUDHARI DHARMENDRA DEVARAM

  2. 2.TRAVELS VEHICLE NO A.R. 01 T 3051 OF OWNER SHREE GANESH TRAVELS PROPRITER LAKHARAM

  3. 3.TRAVELS VEHICLE NO A.R. 01 T. 3051 OF INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

  4. 4.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. R P RAVAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Patan) allowed the applicant to file a Motor Vehicle Act claim petition as an indigent person, finding she lacked sufficient means to pay court fees. The court reasoned that the Motor Vehicle Act's beneficial nature and constitutional guarantee of justice prohibit denying compensation remedies due to inability to pay fees, with court fees remaining a first charge on any awarded compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 816/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Patan) allowed the applicant to file a Motor Vehicle Act claim petition as an indigent person, finding she lacked sufficient means to pay court fees. The court reasoned that the Motor Vehicle Act's beneficial nature and constitutional guarantee of justice prohibit denying compensation remedies due to inability to pay fees, with court fees remaining a first charge on any awarded compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case