Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR RAMJIJI SURESHJI ALIES SURAJI HAMIRJI Advocate - R B JOSHI — 68/2024
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),78(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPT010029382024
Filing Number
68/2024
Filing Date
27-Nov-2024
Registration No
68/2024
Registration Date
27-Nov-2024
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN
Judge
4-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217030241047
Police Station
SIDHPUR POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. J J BAROT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAKOR RAMJIJI SURESHJI ALIES SURAJI HAMIRJI Advocate - R B JOSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Special POCSO Court in Patan acquitted the accused Ramjiji Sureshji (also known as Suraj Hamir Thakore) of charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 78(2), and POCSO Act Section 12. The court found that while the prosecution established the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident on 25 September 2024, it failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused lured, threatened, or abducted her with sexual intent. The victim's testimony contained significant contradictions, her parents' accounts were inconsistent, and no independent corroborating evidence of the alleged offense was produced, resulting in the accused's complete acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Further Statement
3rd Addl District Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2025
Summons - Notice
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Summons - Notice
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 68/2024
Summary The Special POCSO Court in Patan acquitted the accused Ramjiji Sureshji (also known as Suraj Hamir Thakore) of charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 78(2), and POCSO Act Section 12. The court found that while the prosecution established the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident on 25 September 2024, it failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused lured, threatened, or abducted her with sexual intent. The victim's testimony contained significant contradictions, her parents' accounts were inconsistent, and no independent corroborating evidence of the alleged offense was produced, resulting in the accused's complete acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts