THAKOR VIRAMJI BACHUJI LEGAL HAIR(Legal Heir) vs CHOLA MANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. Advocate - H N PATEL — 356/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJPT010029012023
Filing Number
356/2023
Filing Date
22-Nov-2023
Registration No
356/2023
Registration Date
22-Nov-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THAKOR VIRAMJI BACHUJI LEGAL HAIR(Legal Heir)
Adv. B G THAKOR1.
-
2.THAKOR BACHUJI TARASANGJI
Adv. B G THAKOR1.
-
3.THAKOR VIJABEN BACHUJI
Adv. B G THAKOR1.
-
4.THAKOR PINTUJI BACHUJI
Adv. B G THAKOR1.
-
5.VIDHATAR PINKIBEN BACHUJI
Adv. B G THAKOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHOLA MANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. Advocate - H N PATEL
-
2.THAKOR JIGARJI RAJUJI
Adv. V C THAKOR
-
3.CHANDISARA MATHURJI KURAJI
Adv. V R THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partially allowed the compensation petition filed by legal heirs of a 27-year-old deceased who died in a bike accident on 25/09/2023. The tribunal found the bike driver solely negligent and awarded Rs. 17,58,200 comprising Rs. 16,42,200 for dependency loss (using a multiplier of 17 on assessed monthly income of Rs. 8,050) and Rs. 1,16,000 for conventional heads including funeral expenses and filial consortium. The insurance company was held liable with recovery rights against the vehicle owner, applying the "pay and recover" principle per Allahabad High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Opponents Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Opponents Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Applicants Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Applicants Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-May-2025
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Apr-2025
Applicants Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
08-Mar-2025
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
15-Jan-2025
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
14-Dec-2024
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Oct-2024
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
14-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-Jun-2024
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-May-2024
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
02-May-2024
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
04-Apr-2024
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2024
Summons - Notice
2nd Addl District Judge
-
29-Feb-2024
Summons - Notice
2nd Addl District Judge
-
01-Feb-2024
Summons - Notice
2nd Addl District Judge
-
28-Dec-2023
Summons - Notice
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 356/2023
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partially allowed the compensation petition filed by legal heirs of a 27-year-old deceased who died in a bike accident on 25/09/2023. The tribunal found the bike driver solely negligent and awarded Rs. 17,58,200 comprising Rs. 16,42,200 for dependency loss (using a multiplier of 17 on assessed monthly income of Rs. 8,050) and Rs. 1,16,000 for conventional heads including funeral expenses and filial consortium. The insurance company was held liable with recovery rights against the vehicle owner, applying the "pay and recover" principle per Allahabad High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts