PATNI AMRATBHAI AMTHABHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P RAVAL — 728/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJPT010027342025

Filing Number

728/2025

Filing Date

12-Nov-2025

Registration No

728/2025

Registration Date

12-Nov-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 33

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATNI AMRATBHAI AMTHABHAI

    Adv. M I MANSURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P RAVAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Patan) allowed the applicant's application to file a Motor Vehicles Act Section 166 compensation petition as an indigent person, recognizing that financial inability should not bar access to justice in accident compensation cases. The tribunal directed registration of the petition and permitted deferred payment of court fees, with any fees ultimately constituting a first charge against the awarded compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  7. 01-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 728/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Patan) allowed the applicant's application to file a Motor Vehicles Act Section 166 compensation petition as an indigent person, recognizing that financial inability should not bar access to justice in accident compensation cases. The tribunal directed registration of the petition and permitted deferred payment of court fees, with any fees ultimately constituting a first charge against the awarded compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case