Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR KALAJI KARASHANJI Advocate - A L DESAI — 732/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPL- SESSIONS

CNR: GJPT010019812024

Filing Number

732/2024

Filing Date

03-Aug-2024

Registration No

732/2024

Registration Date

03-Aug-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

3-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217009200712

Police Station

HARIJ POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR KALAJI KARASHANJI Advocate - A L DESAI

  2. 2.THAKOR SHRAVANJI @ GUGAJI KARASHANJI

    Adv. A L DESAI

  3. 3.THAKOR SURESHJI RAMJIJI

    Adv. A L DESAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Patan Additional Sessions Court rejected the prosecution's application to cancel the bail of three accused persons under BNS Section 438(3). The court found no concrete evidence that the accused violated the bail condition requiring them to maintain peace and harmony, noting that the prosecution's allegations were merely accusations without proof of actual commission of the crimes. Accordingly, the court dismissed the bail cancellation petition and ordered the accused to remain on regular bail with the existing conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  9. 01-Jan-2026

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  14. 22-Sep-2025

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  16. 30-Jun-2025

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  17. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Respondents

    4th Addl District Judge

  18. 05-May-2025

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  19. 07-Apr-2025

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  20. 17-Mar-2025

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  21. 24-Feb-2025

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  22. 15-Feb-2025

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  23. 18-Jan-2025

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  24. 21-Dec-2024

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  25. 16-Nov-2024

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  26. 19-Oct-2024

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  27. 05-Oct-2024

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  28. 21-Sep-2024

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  29. 31-Aug-2024

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  30. 21-Aug-2024

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  31. 14-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  32. 09-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 03-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 732/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Patan Additional Sessions Court rejected the prosecution's application to cancel the bail of three accused persons under BNS Section 438(3). The court found no concrete evidence that the accused violated the bail condition requiring them to maintain peace and harmony, noting that the prosecution's allegations were merely accusations without proof of actual commission of the crimes. Accordingly, the court dismissed the bail cancellation petition and ordered the accused to remain on regular bail with the existing conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case