Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR CHANDANJI VIHAJI Advocate - S D SIYOLA — 35/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(2)(N),376(3),323,506(2),228(A),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 23rd April 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPT010017922024
Filing Number
35/2024
Filing Date
09-Jul-2024
Registration No
35/2024
Registration Date
09-Jul-2024
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN
Judge
4-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217026240242
Police Station
PATAN TALUKA POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. J J BAROT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAKOR CHANDANJI VIHAJI Advocate - S D SIYOLA
-
2.BHARAVAD GOPALBHAI DHANABHAI
Adv. R B JOSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Court Judgment In this POCSO Act case from Patan District Court, the judge convicted appellant #1 (the victim's biological father) of rape and sexual abuse of a minor daughter. The court found that from 2017 onwards, the father repeatedly raped the minor child, subjected her to sexual harassment, and threatened to kill her mother and brother to ensure her silence. The victim's two sisters also testified to similar abuse they suffered. The court sentenced the father to 20 years rigorous imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹4,00,000 to the victim. Appellant #2 was acquitted due to insufficient evidence regarding charges of making and circulating an explicit video. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
15-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
31-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Defence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Defence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Defence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Defence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Defence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Defence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Defence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Defence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Defence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Defence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
14-Jul-2025
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
30-Jun-2025
Further Statement
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
31-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
21-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
07-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
30-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
27-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
30-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
26-Sep-2024
Framing Of Charge
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
19-Sep-2024
Framing Of Charge
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
05-Sep-2024
Framing Of Charge
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Framing Of Charge
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
30-Jul-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
16-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2024
Summary of Court Judgment In this POCSO Act case from Patan District Court, the judge convicted appellant #1 (the victim's biological father) of rape and sexual abuse of a minor daughter. The court found that from 2017 onwards, the father repeatedly raped the minor child, subjected her to sexual harassment, and threatened to kill her mother and brother to ensure her silence. The victim's two sisters also testified to similar abuse they suffered. The court sentenced the father to 20 years rigorous imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹4,00,000 to the victim. Appellant #2 was acquitted due to insufficient evidence regarding charges of making and circulating an explicit video. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts