Government of Gujarat vs SOLANKI DIPAKKUMAR SARJANSINH RAYJIBHAI Advocate - J C THAKOR — 13/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),64(2)(M),65(1),87,54,142. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPT010011662025
Filing Number
13/2025
Filing Date
14-May-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
14-May-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN
Judge
4-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217009250084
Police Station
HARIJ POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. J J BAROT
Respondent(s)
-
1.SOLANKI DIPAKKUMAR SARJANSINH RAYJIBHAI Advocate - J C THAKOR
-
2.PARMAR MANOJ FATESINH CHOTABHAI
Adv. J C THAKOR
-
3.BARIYA VIJAYKUMAR MOHANBHAI LALABHAI
Adv. J C THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Judgment Summary The Special POCSO Court in Patan acquitted all three accused of charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and the Indian Penal Code. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident, and the victim's own testimony contradicted the charges of abduction and sexual assault, stating the events were consensual. Consequently, all three accused were acquitted and discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Further Statement
3rd Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Framing Of Charge
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
28-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2025
Court Judgment Summary The Special POCSO Court in Patan acquitted all three accused of charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and the Indian Penal Code. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged incident, and the victim's own testimony contradicted the charges of abduction and sexual assault, stating the events were consensual. Consequently, all three accused were acquitted and discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts