THAKOR AJITJI HIMMATJI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J BAROT — 191/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPL- SESSIONS

CNR: GJPT010005722026

Filing Number

191/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

191/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217004260004

Police Station

BALISANA POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR AJITJI HIMMATJI

    Adv. A M THAKKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J BAROT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Patan granted regular bail to Ajitji Himmatji Thakor, accused of liquor smuggling under the Prohibition Act, finding no muddamal was seized from his actual possession, no criminal history, and parity with a co-accused already released on bail. The bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with strict conditions including cooperation in investigation, travel restrictions, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 191/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Patan granted regular bail to Ajitji Himmatji Thakor, accused of liquor smuggling under the Prohibition Act, finding no muddamal was seized from his actual possession, no criminal history, and parity with a co-accused already released on bail. The bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with strict conditions including cooperation in investigation, travel restrictions, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case