SOLANKI AKBARBHAI HUSAINBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 190/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPL- SESSIONS

CNR: GJPT010005692026

Filing Number

190/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

190/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

3-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217006231090

Police Station

CHANASMA POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)

Petitioner(s)

1.SOLANKI AKBARBHAI HUSAINBHAI

Adv. B K PANCHAL

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
17-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Patan rejected the bail application of accused Akbarmbhai Husenmbhai Solanki, who is accused of murder and other serious offenses under IPC Sections 302, 307, and 34. The court held that despite the accused's personal and family hardships (Ramzan Eid celebrations and wife's medical treatment), the gravity of the murder charges, the investigating officer's concerns about flight risk and witness intimidation, and the accused's active role in the incident made bail inappropriate at this stage of trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
17-Mar-2026

Disposed

4th Addl District Judge
13-Mar-2026

Order

4th Addl District Judge
12-Mar-2026

Hearing

4th Addl District Judge
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 190/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Patan rejected the bail application of accused Akbarmbhai Husenmbhai Solanki, who is accused of murder and other serious offenses under IPC Sections 302, 307, and 34. The court held that despite the accused's personal and family hardships (Ramzan Eid celebrations and wife's medical treatment), the gravity of the murder charges, the investigating officer's concerns about flight risk and witness intimidation, and the accused's active role in the incident made bail inappropriate at this stage of trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.