POLADI JAHIRKHAN USMANKHAN vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J BAROT — 19/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJPT010005242026
Filing Number
19/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
19/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN
Judge
4-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217030260120
Police Station
SIDHPUR POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.POLADI JAHIRKHAN USMANKHAN
Adv. R B JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J BAROT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court allowed the petitioner's revision application and overturned the lower court's order refusing to return a seized Maruti Suzuki Baleno car. The court held that since the vehicle's ownership was established to be the petitioner's, the vehicle was not essential for investigation, and prolonged police custody would cause deterioration; therefore, the vehicle should be returned to the petitioner on bail with specified conditions, including furnishing a bond equal to half the vehicle's assessed value and adhering to strict usage restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2026
Summary The court allowed the petitioner's revision application and overturned the lower court's order refusing to return a seized Maruti Suzuki Baleno car. The court held that since the vehicle's ownership was established to be the petitioner's, the vehicle was not essential for investigation, and prolonged police custody would cause deterioration; therefore, the vehicle should be returned to the petitioner on bail with specified conditions, including furnishing a bond equal to half the vehicle's assessed value and adhering to strict usage restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts