DEORA HANSPAL SINGH SURENDRA SINGH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J D THAKKER — 181/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPL- SESSIONS

CNR: GJPT010005152026

Filing Number

181/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

181/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217040250649

Police Station

VAGDOD POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEORA HANSPAL SINGH SURENDRA SINGH

    Adv. V R PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - J D THAKKER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Patan Sessions Court rejected Hanspal Singh Deora's anticipatory bail application in a liquor smuggling case involving Rs. 28,90,128 worth of foreign liquor illegally brought into Gujarat from Rajasthan under the Prohibition Act. The court found the allegations serious, deemed custodial interrogation necessary for the ongoing investigation, and rejected the applicant's mistaken identity defense, concluding that granting bail was not in the interest of justice at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 181/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Patan Sessions Court rejected Hanspal Singh Deora's anticipatory bail application in a liquor smuggling case involving Rs. 28,90,128 worth of foreign liquor illegally brought into Gujarat from Rajasthan under the Prohibition Act. The court found the allegations serious, deemed custodial interrogation necessary for the ongoing investigation, and rejected the applicant's mistaken identity defense, concluding that granting bail was not in the interest of justice at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case