CHAUHAN YUVRAJSINH MANUJI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J BAROT — 180/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPL- SESSIONS

CNR: GJPT010005062026

Filing Number

180/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

180/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

4-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217004260035

Police Station

BALISANA POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

1.CHAUHAN YUVRAJSINH MANUJI

Adv. P S THAKOR

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - J J BAROT

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
07-Mar-2026

JudegementView PDF

The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Patan rejected the bail application of Chauhan Yuvrajsinh Manuji, accused of kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 17-year-old minor girl under POCSO Act provisions. The court found the allegations extremely serious, involving abduction under the pretext of marriage, repeated sexual assault, and trafficking, noting that granting bail would undermine law enforcement and send a wrong message to society given the grave nature of offences against a minor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
07-Mar-2026

Disposed

3rd Addl District Judge
06-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
03-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 180/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Patan rejected the bail application of Chauhan Yuvrajsinh Manuji, accused of kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 17-year-old minor girl under POCSO Act provisions. The court found the allegations extremely serious, involving abduction under the pretext of marriage, repeated sexual assault, and trafficking, noting that granting bail would undermine law enforcement and send a wrong message to society given the grave nature of offences against a minor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.