CHAUHAN YUVRAJSINH BHERUSINH DIPSINH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - J D THAKKER — 175/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPL- SESSIONS

CNR: GJPT010004902026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

175/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

175/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

4-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217004260035

Police Station

BALISANA POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

CHAUHAN YUVRAJSINH BHERUSINH DIPSINH

Adv. A M THAKER

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - J D THAKKER

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

HEARING

05-03-2026

HEARING

02-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court granted regular bail to the applicant Yuvrajsinh Bherusinh Dipsinh Chauhan, accused of kidnapping and offenses under POCSO Act, finding insufficient evidence against him of establishing physical relationship or using force/threats against the minor victim. The applicant was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including monthly police station attendance, court appearances, travel restrictions, and prohibition on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to the applicant Yuvrajsinh Bherusinh Dipsinh Chauhan, accused of kidnapping and offenses under POCSO Act, finding insufficient evidence against him of establishing physical relationship or using force/threats against the minor victim. The applicant was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including monthly police station attendance, court appearances, travel restrictions, and prohibition on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case