VANKAR AMRUTBHAI DANABHAI vs JAY GOGA CEMENT PRODUCTS PARTNER PATEL VIJESH ISHWARBHAI Advocate - G D VYAS — 164/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPL- SESSIONS
CNR: GJPT010004592026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
164/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
164/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VANKAR AMRUTBHAI DANABHAI
Adv. U S PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
JAY GOGA CEMENT PRODUCTS PARTNER PATEL VIJESH ISHWARBHAI Advocate - G D VYAS
Government of Gujarat
Adv. J J BAROT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge at Patan allowed the applicant Vankar Amrutlal Danabhai's application to condone a delay of 8 months and 31 days in filing a criminal appeal against a trial court order. The court found the applicant's reasons—lack of legal procedure knowledge and inability to contact his advocate timely—to be valid and genuine, prioritizing substantial justice over technical procedural requirements. The applicant must deposit ₹3,000 as cost within seven days for the order to take effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge at Patan allowed the applicant Vankar Amrutlal Danabhai's application to condone a delay of 8 months and 31 days in filing a criminal appeal against a trial court order. The court found the applicant's reasons—lack of legal procedure knowledge and inability to contact his advocate timely—to be valid and genuine, prioritizing substantial justice over technical procedural requirements. The applicant must deposit ₹3,000 as cost within seven days for the order to take effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts