VANKAR AMRUTBHAI DANABHAI vs JAY GOGA CEMENT PRODUCTS PARTNER PATEL VIJESH ISHWARBHAI Advocate - G D VYAS — 164/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPL- SESSIONS

CNR: GJPT010004592026

Filing Number

164/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

164/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VANKAR AMRUTBHAI DANABHAI

    Adv. U S PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAY GOGA CEMENT PRODUCTS PARTNER PATEL VIJESH ISHWARBHAI Advocate - G D VYAS

  2. 2.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. J J BAROT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge at Patan allowed the applicant Vankar Amrutlal Danabhai's application to condone a delay of 8 months and 31 days in filing a criminal appeal against a trial court order. The court found the applicant's reasons—lack of legal procedure knowledge and inability to contact his advocate timely—to be valid and genuine, prioritizing substantial justice over technical procedural requirements. The applicant must deposit ₹3,000 as cost within seven days for the order to take effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 164/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Patan allowed the applicant Vankar Amrutlal Danabhai's application to condone a delay of 8 months and 31 days in filing a criminal appeal against a trial court order. The court found the applicant's reasons—lack of legal procedure knowledge and inability to contact his advocate timely—to be valid and genuine, prioritizing substantial justice over technical procedural requirements. The applicant must deposit ₹3,000 as cost within seven days for the order to take effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case