VANKAR AMRUTBHAI DANABHAI vs JAY GOGA CEMENT PRODUCTS PARTNER PATEL VIJESH ISHWARBHAI Advocate - G D VYAS — 164/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPL- SESSIONS

CNR: GJPT010004592026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

164/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

164/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

LIMITATION ACT, 1963 Section 5,

Petitioner(s)

VANKAR AMRUTBHAI DANABHAI

Adv. U S PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

JAY GOGA CEMENT PRODUCTS PARTNER PATEL VIJESH ISHWARBHAI Advocate - G D VYAS

Government of Gujarat

Adv. J J BAROT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
ORDER

The Sessions Judge at Patan allowed the applicant Vankar Amrutlal Danabhai's application to condone a delay of 8 months and 31 days in filing a criminal appeal against a trial court order. The court found the applicant's reasons—lack of legal procedure knowledge and inability to contact his advocate timely—to be valid and genuine, prioritizing substantial justice over technical procedural requirements. The applicant must deposit ₹3,000 as cost within seven days for the order to take effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Patan allowed the applicant Vankar Amrutlal Danabhai's application to condone a delay of 8 months and 31 days in filing a criminal appeal against a trial court order. The court found the applicant's reasons—lack of legal procedure knowledge and inability to contact his advocate timely—to be valid and genuine, prioritizing substantial justice over technical procedural requirements. The applicant must deposit ₹3,000 as cost within seven days for the order to take effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case