THAKOR KIRTIJI VINUJI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P RAVAL — 158/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPL- SESSIONS
CNR: GJPT010004532026
Filing Number
158/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
158/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217030260115
Police Station
SIDHPUR POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THAKOR KIRTIJI VINUJI
Adv. J A SHRIMALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P RAVAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Court in Patan rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Thakore Kirtiji Vinuji under Section 482 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, along with others, kidnapped the complainant, extorted money through threats of violence and bounced checks, and made death threats. The court noted the accused had absconded since the crime date (04/02/2026) and the complaint was filed on 06/02/2026, and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary for proper investigation, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 158/2026
Summary: The Sessions Court in Patan rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Thakore Kirtiji Vinuji under Section 482 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, along with others, kidnapped the complainant, extorted money through threats of violence and bounced checks, and made death threats. The court noted the accused had absconded since the crime date (04/02/2026) and the complaint was filed on 06/02/2026, and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary for proper investigation, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts