MEMAN LAMAHAMAD GAFURBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P RAVAL — 15/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJPT010003882026
Filing Number
15/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217041250563
Police Station
SARASWATI POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MEMAN LAMAHAMAD GAFURBHAI
Adv. M D PANDYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P RAVAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge, Patan allowed the applicant's criminal revision application and directed the police to return his seized Maruti Swift car (GJ-18-BR-3428) as interim custody. The applicant had sold the vehicle to an accused person four months prior via verbal agreement but RTO ownership remained in his name; the car was seized during investigation and the trial court had rejected his custody request. The court found the trial court's order illegal and perverse, and ordered release upon furnishing a bail bond of 1.5 times the vehicle's value, with conditions that the applicant maintain the vehicle's original condition, not transfer/sell/mortgage it, and not use it in any offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Urgent Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2026
Summary The Sessions Judge, Patan allowed the applicant's criminal revision application and directed the police to return his seized Maruti Swift car (GJ-18-BR-3428) as interim custody. The applicant had sold the vehicle to an accused person four months prior via verbal agreement but RTO ownership remained in his name; the car was seized during investigation and the trial court had rejected his custody request. The court found the trial court's order illegal and perverse, and ordered release upon furnishing a bail bond of 1.5 times the vehicle's value, with conditions that the applicant maintain the vehicle's original condition, not transfer/sell/mortgage it, and not use it in any offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts