MEMAN LAMAHAMAD GAFURBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P RAVAL — 15/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJPT010003882026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

15/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217041250563

Police Station

SARASWATI POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497,

Petitioner(s)

MEMAN LAMAHAMAD GAFURBHAI

Adv. M D PANDYA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P RAVAL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

06-03-2026

URGENT HEARING

24-02-2026

URGENT HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sessions Judge, Patan allowed the applicant's criminal revision application and directed the police to return his seized Maruti Swift car (GJ-18-BR-3428) as interim custody. The applicant had sold the vehicle to an accused person four months prior via verbal agreement but RTO ownership remained in his name; the car was seized during investigation and the trial court had rejected his custody request. The court found the trial court's order illegal and perverse, and ordered release upon furnishing a bail bond of 1.5 times the vehicle's value, with conditions that the applicant maintain the vehicle's original condition, not transfer/sell/mortgage it, and not use it in any offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Patan allowed the applicant's criminal revision application and directed the police to return his seized Maruti Swift car (GJ-18-BR-3428) as interim custody. The applicant had sold the vehicle to an accused person four months prior via verbal agreement but RTO ownership remained in his name; the car was seized during investigation and the trial court had rejected his custody request. The court found the trial court's order illegal and perverse, and ordered release upon furnishing a bail bond of 1.5 times the vehicle's value, with conditions that the applicant maintain the vehicle's original condition, not transfer/sell/mortgage it, and not use it in any offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case