RATHOD PRADIPKUMAR TRIKAMLAL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 6/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)(A). Status: Final Hearing. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

Final Hearing Next hearing 04-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJPT010000442026

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RATHOD PRADIPKUMAR TRIKAMLAL

    Adv. P C NAYAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

  2. 2.ARODIA KIFAYATULLA RASULBHAI

    Adv. I R BHATTI

Case History

  1. 04-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The application is allowed. The court ordered that the 20% amount deposited by the appellant/accused under Section-138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act shall be paid to the original complainant, conditional upon the complainant returning the amount with RBI-prescribed interest if the appellant is acquitted on appeal. The complainant must submit an undertaking before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    For R&P

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application is allowed. The court ordered that the 20% amount deposited by the appellant/accused under Section-138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act shall be paid to the original complainant, conditional upon the complainant returning the amount with RBI-prescribed interest if the appellant is acquitted on appeal. The complainant must submit an undertaking before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case