RAJIVBHAI HEMRAJ SURAIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 10/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374,. Status: URGENT HEARING. Next hearing: 20th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJPM170008112022
Next Hearing
20th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10/2022
Filing Date
30-03-2022
Registration No
10/2022
Registration Date
30-03-2022
Court
ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJIVBHAI HEMRAJ SURAIYA
Adv. A T SHETH
RAMESH HANSRAJ DHARAMSHI
Adv. K M BHATT
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING | |
| 12-02-2026 | URGENT HEARING | |
| 27-01-2026 | URGENT HEARING | |
| 13-01-2026 | URGENT HEARING | |
| 22-12-2025 | URGENT HEARING |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Criminal Appeal No. 53/2022 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The appeal is DISMISSED. The appellant's conviction under IPC Section 409 (criminal breach of trust) for 3 years simple imprisonment is upheld. The court rejected the appellant's plea that documents proving non-employment with the companies in question should be admitted into the record, finding that the appellant failed to produce these documents during trial without valid justification, and cannot now rely on them as evidence of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Criminal Appeal No. 53/2022 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The appeal is DISMISSED. The appellant's conviction under IPC Section 409 (criminal breach of trust) for 3 years simple imprisonment is upheld. The court rejected the appellant's plea that documents proving non-employment with the companies in question should be admitted into the record, finding that the appellant failed to produce these documents during trial without valid justification, and cannot now rely on them as evidence of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts