STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHVINBHAI RAMESHBHAI DAMOR Advocate - J P PARMAR — 19/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(I),64(2)(M). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJPM170006382025

Filing Number

19/2025

Filing Date

28-Apr-2025

Registration No

19/2025

Registration Date

28-Apr-2025

Court

ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL

Judge

1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

631

Police Station

RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(I),64(2)(M)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,6,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. AGP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHVINBHAI RAMESHBHAI DAMOR Advocate - J P PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Judegement

    CASE 19/2025 SUMMARY On 04.06.2026, the Special POCSO Court (Panchmahal) acquitted Ashvinbhai Rameshbhai Damor of charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i), 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 4, 6, 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged 27-28 July 2024 incident, citing contradictory birth dates (17.02.2007 vs. 09.04.2008) with no reliable corroboration. Additionally, the court determined the relationship was consensual, the victim eloped willingly, and no forced intercourse was established, resulting in the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Further Statement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 14-May-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  8. 13-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  13. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  14. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  15. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  16. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  17. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  18. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  19. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  20. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  21. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  22. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  23. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  24. 20-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  25. 19-May-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  26. 15-May-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  27. 12-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 28-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE 19/2025 SUMMARY On 04.06.2026, the Special POCSO Court (Panchmahal) acquitted Ashvinbhai Rameshbhai Damor of charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i), 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 4, 6, 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged 27-28 July 2024 incident, citing contradictory birth dates (17.02.2007 vs. 09.04.2008) with no reliable corroboration. Additionally, the court determined the relationship was consensual, the victim eloped willingly, and no forced intercourse was established, resulting in the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case