STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHVINBHAI RAMESHBHAI DAMOR Advocate - J P PARMAR — 19/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(I),64(2)(M). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 04th June 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPM170006382025
Filing Number
19/2025
Filing Date
28-04-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
28-04-2025
Court
ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
04th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
631
Police Station
RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
ASHVINBHAI RAMESHBHAI DAMOR Advocate - J P PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-06-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 02-06-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 14-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 30-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE 19/2025 SUMMARY On 04.06.2026, the Special POCSO Court (Panchmahal) acquitted Ashvinbhai Rameshbhai Damor of charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i), 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 4, 6, 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged 27-28 July 2024 incident, citing contradictory birth dates (17.02.2007 vs. 09.04.2008) with no reliable corroboration. Additionally, the court determined the relationship was consensual, the victim eloped willingly, and no forced intercourse was established, resulting in the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE 19/2025 SUMMARY On 04.06.2026, the Special POCSO Court (Panchmahal) acquitted Ashvinbhai Rameshbhai Damor of charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i), 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 4, 6, 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged 27-28 July 2024 incident, citing contradictory birth dates (17.02.2007 vs. 09.04.2008) with no reliable corroboration. Additionally, the court determined the relationship was consensual, the victim eloped willingly, and no forced intercourse was established, resulting in the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts