BHARATSINH KIRANSINH SOLANKI vs DILIPBHAI DAHYABHAI RATHOD — 43/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJPM170005042020
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
43/2020
Filing Date
01-02-2020
Registration No
43/2020
Registration Date
01-02-2020
Court
ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL
Judge
2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHARATSINH KIRANSINH SOLANKI
Adv. V C JOSHI
Respondent(s)
DILIPBHAI DAHYABHAI RATHOD
DAHYABHAI MADABHAI RATHOD
BAJAJ ALIANCE GEN INSU. GEN. CO. LI.
Adv. A.B.RAVAL
SUBHASBHAI GOVINDBHAI RATHOD
Adv. R G RATHOD
ICICI LO. GEN. CO. LI
Adv. S.S.PARIKH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 26-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT | |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT | |
| 16-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed MAC Petition No. 43 of 2020 for non-prosecution/default. The applicant had filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking Rs. 5,00,000 compensation for injuries from a 2011 accident, but repeatedly failed to appear before the tribunal to lead evidence despite multiple opportunities and adjournments granted. The tribunal found the applicant had no genuine interest in pursuing the case and dismissed the petition on 22-09-2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed MAC Petition No. 43 of 2020 for non-prosecution/default. The applicant had filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking Rs. 5,00,000 compensation for injuries from a 2011 accident, but repeatedly failed to appear before the tribunal to lead evidence despite multiple opportunities and adjournments granted. The tribunal found the applicant had no genuine interest in pursuing the case and dismissed the petition on 22-09-2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts