VIKRAMSINH ASHVINSINH RANA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 117/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - S

CNR: GJPM170003762026

Case disposed

Filing Number

117/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

117/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL

Judge

1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

167

Police Station

HALOL TOWN POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 115(2),118(2),352,54
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

VIKRAMSINH ASHVINSINH RANA

Adv. S K PRAJAPATI

VISHALBHAI VITHALBHAI SOLANKI

VISHALBHAI ARVINDBHAI PARMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 117 of 2026 The court rejected the bail application of three accused (Vikramsinh Rana, Vishal Solanki, and Vishalbhai Parmar) charged with assault causing serious head injuries. The judge found the complainant sustained critical injuries including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraparenchymal contusion, and skull fracture, and determined that despite hospital discharge, the victim requires further medical treatment and cannot be considered out of danger. With investigation still pending, the court held bail premature and unsafe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 117 of 2026 The court rejected the bail application of three accused (Vikramsinh Rana, Vishal Solanki, and Vishalbhai Parmar) charged with assault causing serious head injuries. The judge found the complainant sustained critical injuries including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraparenchymal contusion, and skull fracture, and determined that despite hospital discharge, the victim requires further medical treatment and cannot be considered out of danger. With investigation still pending, the court held bail premature and unsafe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case