VIKRAMSINH ASHVINSINH RANA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 117/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - S
CNR: GJPM170003762026
Filing Number
117/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
117/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL
Judge
1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
167
Police Station
HALOL TOWN POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKRAMSINH ASHVINSINH RANA
Adv. S K PRAJAPATI
-
2.VISHALBHAI VITHALBHAI SOLANKI
-
3.VISHALBHAI ARVINDBHAI PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 117 of 2026 The court rejected the bail application of three accused (Vikramsinh Rana, Vishal Solanki, and Vishalbhai Parmar) charged with assault causing serious head injuries. The judge found the complainant sustained critical injuries including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraparenchymal contusion, and skull fracture, and determined that despite hospital discharge, the victim requires further medical treatment and cannot be considered out of danger. With investigation still pending, the court held bail premature and unsafe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 117/2026
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. Application No. 117 of 2026 The court rejected the bail application of three accused (Vikramsinh Rana, Vishal Solanki, and Vishalbhai Parmar) charged with assault causing serious head injuries. The judge found the complainant sustained critical injuries including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraparenchymal contusion, and skull fracture, and determined that despite hospital discharge, the victim requires further medical treatment and cannot be considered out of danger. With investigation still pending, the court held bail premature and unsafe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts