DHARAMDAS GOVINDBHAI HARIJAN (BHANGI) vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 90/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - S

CNR: GJPM170002932026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

90/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL

Judge

2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

DHARAMDAS GOVINDBHAI HARIJAN (BHANGI)

Adv. M I MAKRANI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

ORDER

02-03-2026

ORDER

25-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Court (Halol) rejected the bail petition filed by the accused under the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act, 2011 and IPC provisions. The court found that the accused killed a cow, sold its meat, and possessed the kill weapons and meat in their custody—serious charges that warrant continued detention. The court denied bail, citing the nature and gravity of the offense, lack of prima facie evidence of innocence, and the risk of tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Court (Halol) rejected the bail petition filed by the accused under the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act, 2011 and IPC provisions. The court found that the accused killed a cow, sold its meat, and possessed the kill weapons and meat in their custody—serious charges that warrant continued detention. The court denied bail, citing the nature and gravity of the offense, lack of prima facie evidence of innocence, and the risk of tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case