ABEDALI MUKHTYARALI MAKRANI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 89/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - S

CNR: GJPM170002922026

Filing Number

89/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL

Judge

2-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABEDALI MUKHTYARALI MAKRANI

    Adv. M I MAKRANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Court at Halol, hearing a case under the Gujarat Animal Cruelty Prevention Act 2011, acquitted the accused of charges related to illegal cattle slaughter. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the accused's role in the crime beyond reasonable doubt, though it noted the case involved animal cruelty violations. The court directed the release of seized land under specified conditions while maintaining that the prosecution failed to establish guilt with the required legal certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Order

    3rd Addl District Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Court at Halol, hearing a case under the Gujarat Animal Cruelty Prevention Act 2011, acquitted the accused of charges related to illegal cattle slaughter. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the accused's role in the crime beyond reasonable doubt, though it noted the case involved animal cruelty violations. The court directed the release of seized land under specified conditions while maintaining that the prosecution failed to establish guilt with the required legal certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case