JIGAR NAVINCHAND PARIKH vs NIRANJAN BHAGVANDAS THAKKAR Advocate - R B PARMAR — 20/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 413. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJPM170002682026
Filing Number
20/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
20/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JIGAR NAVINCHAND PARIKH
Adv. D S RATHOD
Respondent(s)
NIRANJAN BHAGVANDAS THAKKAR Advocate - R B PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
FOR R&P
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
| 18-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR R&P |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 20/2026 Court Decision: The appellate court REJECTED the appeal and CONFIRMED the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt due to: (1) no documentary evidence of the alleged ₹35.45 lakh loan; (2) failure to disclose the transaction in income tax returns; and (3) insufficient proof of financial capacity, raising suspicions of illegal money lending and potential money laundering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 20/2026 Court Decision: The appellate court REJECTED the appeal and CONFIRMED the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt due to: (1) no documentary evidence of the alleged ₹35.45 lakh loan; (2) failure to disclose the transaction in income tax returns; and (3) insufficient proof of financial capacity, raising suspicions of illegal money lending and potential money laundering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts