STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRADEEPBHAI PRABHATBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - B M JADAV — 18/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 419,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 05th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJPM170002242026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
18/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
PRADEEPBHAI PRABHATBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - B M JADAV
PUSHPABEN PRABHATBHAI MAKVANA
Adv. B M JADAV
PRABHATBHAI DAHYABHAI MAKVANA
Adv. B M JADAV
VARSHABEN KALPESHBHAI MAKVANA
Adv. B M JADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
URGENT HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 28-02-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahal dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of four accused (husband, parents-in-law, and sister-in-law) in a dowry harassment case under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114. The court found the complainant's allegations of mental cruelty were vague, omnibus, and lacked specific incidents with dates, times, or details—insufficient to constitute Section 498A offense, which requires intentional conduct causing grave injury or suicide risk. The acquittal judgment was confirmed as properly reasoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahal dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of four accused (husband, parents-in-law, and sister-in-law) in a dowry harassment case under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114. The court found the complainant's allegations of mental cruelty were vague, omnibus, and lacked specific incidents with dates, times, or details—insufficient to constitute Section 498A offense, which requires intentional conduct causing grave injury or suicide risk. The acquittal judgment was confirmed as properly reasoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts