STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRADEEPBHAI PRABHATBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - B M JADAV — 18/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 419. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJPM170002242026

Filing Number

18/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

18/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL

Judge

1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 419

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. AGP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADEEPBHAI PRABHATBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - B M JADAV

  2. 2.PUSHPABEN PRABHATBHAI MAKVANA

    Adv. B M JADAV

  3. 3.PRABHATBHAI DAHYABHAI MAKVANA

    Adv. B M JADAV

  4. 4.VARSHABEN KALPESHBHAI MAKVANA

    Adv. B M JADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahal dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of four accused (husband, parents-in-law, and sister-in-law) in a dowry harassment case under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114. The court found the complainant's allegations of mental cruelty were vague, omnibus, and lacked specific incidents with dates, times, or details—insufficient to constitute Section 498A offense, which requires intentional conduct causing grave injury or suicide risk. The acquittal judgment was confirmed as properly reasoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahal dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of four accused (husband, parents-in-law, and sister-in-law) in a dowry harassment case under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114. The court found the complainant's allegations of mental cruelty were vague, omnibus, and lacked specific incidents with dates, times, or details—insufficient to constitute Section 498A offense, which requires intentional conduct causing grave injury or suicide risk. The acquittal judgment was confirmed as properly reasoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case