EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION THROUGH BRANCH OFFICE MANAGER ESCI CORPORATION, HALOL vs M/S. CONFIDENCE PETROLIUM INDIA LTD. Advocate - S.J.SHAH — 30/2018
Case under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 85,45. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM130007192018
Filing Number
30/2018
Filing Date
10-07-2014
Registration No
30/2018
Registration Date
10-07-2014
Court
LABOUR COURT, GODHRA
Judge
3-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION THROUGH BRANCH OFFICE MANAGER ESCI CORPORATION, HALOL
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
M/S. CONFIDENCE PETROLIUM INDIA LTD. Advocate - S.J.SHAH
YATIN KHARA
Adv. S.J.SHAH
ILESH KHARA
Adv. S.J.SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 23-02-2026 | PLEA |
| 13-02-2026 | PLEA |
| 31-12-2025 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 30/2018 The District Court of Godhra convicted M/S. Confidence Petroleum India Ltd. and its principals (Yatin Khara and Ilesh Khara) for violations of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The company failed to remit mandatory ESI contributions for the period November 2012 to May 2013, violating ESI regulations regarding employer and employee contribution deposits. The court imposed a fine of ₹30,000 with 15 days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment, applying educational rather than purely punitive sentencing per established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 30/2018 The District Court of Godhra convicted M/S. Confidence Petroleum India Ltd. and its principals (Yatin Khara and Ilesh Khara) for violations of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The company failed to remit mandatory ESI contributions for the period November 2012 to May 2013, violating ESI regulations regarding employer and employee contribution deposits. The court imposed a fine of ₹30,000 with 15 days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment, applying educational rather than purely punitive sentencing per established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts