Government of Gujarat SHRI N.N.GALANI, KARKHANA NIRIKSHAK, GODHRA vs MAHESH VAMANRAV THAKAR, PRIORITCAR PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD — 75/2021
Case under Factories Act, 1948 Section 92. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM130003782021
Filing Number
75/2021
Filing Date
17-Nov-2021
Registration No
75/2021
Registration Date
17-Nov-2021
Court
LABOUR COURT, GODHRA
Judge
3-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat SHRI N.N.GALANI, KARKHANA NIRIKSHAK, GODHRA
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHESH VAMANRAV THAKAR, PRIORITCAR PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the case filed by the Government of Gujarat against Mahesh Vamanrav Thakar and PrioritCar Pharmaceuticals for violations under the Gujarat Factory Rules 1963. The court held that since the accused could not be located and no proper address was available for service of summons, the prosecution could not proceed without the accused's presence; therefore, the case was closed with liberty to the prosecution to reopen it upon locating the accused and securing proper service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
14-Mar-2026
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Mar-2026
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Jan-2026
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Dec-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
18-Nov-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Sep-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Sep-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
26-Aug-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-Jul-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Jul-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
31-May-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-May-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
25-Mar-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Mar-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
18-Feb-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Jan-2025
Plea
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
14-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
30-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
14-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-May-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-May-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
16-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-May-2023
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-May-2023
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Jan-2023
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
25-Nov-2022
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
30-Sep-2022
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
04-May-2022
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-Mar-2022
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Feb-2022
Process To Accused
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 75/2021
The court dismissed the case filed by the Government of Gujarat against Mahesh Vamanrav Thakar and PrioritCar Pharmaceuticals for violations under the Gujarat Factory Rules 1963. The court held that since the accused could not be located and no proper address was available for service of summons, the prosecution could not proceed without the accused's presence; therefore, the case was closed with liberty to the prosecution to reopen it upon locating the accused and securing proper service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts