Government of Gujarat SHRI N.N.GALANI, KARKHANA NIRIKSHAK, GODHRA vs MAHESH VAMANRAV THAKAR, PRIORITCAR PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD — 72/2021
Case under Factories Act, 1948 Section 92. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM130003752021
Filing Number
72/2021
Filing Date
17-11-2021
Registration No
72/2021
Registration Date
17-11-2021
Court
LABOUR COURT, GODHRA
Judge
3-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat SHRI N.N.GALANI, KARKHANA NIRIKSHAK, GODHRA
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MAHESH VAMANRAV THAKAR, PRIORITCAR PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 10-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 02-01-2026 | PLEA |
| 13-12-2025 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Mahesh Vamanrav Thakar (72/2021) The court dismissed the case filed by the Government of Gujarat against the respondent, finding no sufficient grounds to proceed. The key issues were that the accused could not be located despite summons and warrants, and the informant failed to take any action to advance the case or provide specific information about the accused's whereabouts. The court held that without locating the accused or obtaining new information, trial could not commence, and therefore the case was closed pending the accused's availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Mahesh Vamanrav Thakar (72/2021) The court dismissed the case filed by the Government of Gujarat against the respondent, finding no sufficient grounds to proceed. The key issues were that the accused could not be located despite summons and warrants, and the informant failed to take any action to advance the case or provide specific information about the accused's whereabouts. The court held that without locating the accused or obtaining new information, trial could not commence, and therefore the case was closed pending the accused's availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts