Government of Gujarat SHRI M K MAAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER, GODHRA vs SAHYOG BRICKS — 44/2022
Case under The Inter-state Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 Section 25,26. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM130001582022
Filing Number
44/2022
Filing Date
30-04-2022
Registration No
44/2022
Registration Date
30-04-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, GODHRA
Judge
3-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat SHRI M K MAAL GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER, GODHRA
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SAHYOG BRICKS
SHRI MOHMMAD AZIM BHATTI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 02-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the case against Sahyog Bricks and Shri Mohammad Azim Bhatti for violations under the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act, 1979 and Rules, 1981. The court found that the petitioner (Government Labour Officer) failed to produce the accused before the court despite summons and could not establish a concrete case, rendering it impossible to proceed with proceedings. The court ordered closure of the case as no prima facie case existed without the presence of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the case against Sahyog Bricks and Shri Mohammad Azim Bhatti for violations under the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act, 1979 and Rules, 1981. The court found that the petitioner (Government Labour Officer) failed to produce the accused before the court despite summons and could not establish a concrete case, rendering it impossible to proceed with proceedings. The court ordered closure of the case as no prima facie case existed without the presence of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts