GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PRABHATSINH SHANABHAI BARIA Advocate - H K BARIA — 1061/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,116B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM090012792024
Filing Number
1061/2024
Filing Date
04-12-2024
Registration No
1061/2024
Registration Date
04-12-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MORVA HADAF
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
645
Police Station
MORVA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRABHATSINH SHANABHAI BARIA Advocate - H K BARIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 05-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 01-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 1061/2024 The court acquitted the accused Prabhatsinh Shanabhai Baria of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in the investigation, including lack of independent witness statements, absence of proper documentation for the seized foreign liquor, failure to conduct physical examination of the accused, and procedural irregularities. The absence of corroborating evidence and proper medical certificates regarding the seized substance rendered the prosecution's case unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 1061/2024 The court acquitted the accused Prabhatsinh Shanabhai Baria of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in the investigation, including lack of independent witness statements, absence of proper documentation for the seized foreign liquor, failure to conduct physical examination of the accused, and procedural irregularities. The absence of corroborating evidence and proper medical certificates regarding the seized substance rendered the prosecution's case unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts