GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PRABHATSINH SHANABHAI BARIA Advocate - H K BARIA — 1061/2024

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,116B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 06th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM090012792024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1061/2024

Filing Date

04-12-2024

Registration No

1061/2024

Registration Date

04-12-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MORVA HADAF

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

645

Police Station

MORVA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AE,116B

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRABHATSINH SHANABHAI BARIA Advocate - H K BARIA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

16-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

05-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

01-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Case 1061/2024 The court acquitted the accused Prabhatsinh Shanabhai Baria of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in the investigation, including lack of independent witness statements, absence of proper documentation for the seized foreign liquor, failure to conduct physical examination of the accused, and procedural irregularities. The absence of corroborating evidence and proper medical certificates regarding the seized substance rendered the prosecution's case unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1061/2024 The court acquitted the accused Prabhatsinh Shanabhai Baria of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical gaps in the investigation, including lack of independent witness statements, absence of proper documentation for the seized foreign liquor, failure to conduct physical examination of the accused, and procedural irregularities. The absence of corroborating evidence and proper medical certificates regarding the seized substance rendered the prosecution's case unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MORVA HADAF All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case