PARMAR UMESHBHAI GANPATBHAI vs DHARMENDRABHAI MANABHAI VANKAR — 41/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJPM090001502026
Filing Number
41/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
41/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MORVA HADAF
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARMAR UMESHBHAI GANPATBHAI
Adv. M B PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.DHARMENDRABHAI MANABHAI VANKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 41/2026 Summary The court took cognizance of a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint filed by Parmar Umeshbhai Ganpatbhai against Dharmendrabhai Manabhai Vankar for cheque dishonor. Finding that the complaint, affidavit, and supporting documents were in order and the prima facie ingredients of the offense were established, the court ordered issuance of summons under Section 227 BNSS without requiring pre-cognizance summons, following the special procedure applicable to NI Act cases. Service of summons was permitted through normal mode, registered post, and email. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2026
Case 41/2026 Summary The court took cognizance of a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint filed by Parmar Umeshbhai Ganpatbhai against Dharmendrabhai Manabhai Vankar for cheque dishonor. Finding that the complaint, affidavit, and supporting documents were in order and the prima facie ingredients of the offense were established, the court ordered issuance of summons under Section 227 BNSS without requiring pre-cognizance summons, following the special procedure applicable to NI Act cases. Service of summons was permitted through normal mode, registered post, and email. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts