PARMAR UMESHBHAI GANPATBHAI vs DHARMENDRABHAI MANABHAI VANKAR — 41/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJPM090001502026
Filing Number
41/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
41/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MORVA HADAF
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARMAR UMESHBHAI GANPATBHAI
Adv. M B PATEL
Respondent(s)
DHARMENDRABHAI MANABHAI VANKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO WITNESSES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO WITNESSES |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 41/2026 Summary The court took cognizance of a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint filed by Parmar Umeshbhai Ganpatbhai against Dharmendrabhai Manabhai Vankar for cheque dishonor. Finding that the complaint, affidavit, and supporting documents were in order and the prima facie ingredients of the offense were established, the court ordered issuance of summons under Section 227 BNSS without requiring pre-cognizance summons, following the special procedure applicable to NI Act cases. Service of summons was permitted through normal mode, registered post, and email. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 41/2026 Summary The court took cognizance of a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint filed by Parmar Umeshbhai Ganpatbhai against Dharmendrabhai Manabhai Vankar for cheque dishonor. Finding that the complaint, affidavit, and supporting documents were in order and the prima facie ingredients of the offense were established, the court ordered issuance of summons under Section 227 BNSS without requiring pre-cognizance summons, following the special procedure applicable to NI Act cases. Service of summons was permitted through normal mode, registered post, and email. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts