THE PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT CO.OP.BANK LTD. SANTROAD (SALIYA) BRANCH MANAGAR vs JITENDRAKUMAR TAKHATSINH PATEL — 13/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJPM090000462026

Filing Number

13/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MORVA HADAF

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT CO.OP.BANK LTD. SANTROAD (SALIYA) BRANCH MANAGAR

    Adv. N G RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRAKUMAR TAKHATSINH PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary (13/2026): The Morva(H) Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the Panchmahal District Co-operative Bank's complaint against Jitendrakumar Takhatsinh Patel under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (cheque bounce offense). The court found the complaint, affidavit, and supporting documents sufficient and issued summons without requiring pre-cognizance inquiry, following Supreme Court precedent that the NI Act, being a special enactment, permits direct cognizance based on documentary evidence. Summons may be served via normal mode, registered post, or email. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Restored

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (13/2026): The Morva(H) Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the Panchmahal District Co-operative Bank's complaint against Jitendrakumar Takhatsinh Patel under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (cheque bounce offense). The court found the complaint, affidavit, and supporting documents sufficient and issued summons without requiring pre-cognizance inquiry, following Supreme Court precedent that the NI Act, being a special enactment, permits direct cognizance based on documentary evidence. Summons may be served via normal mode, registered post, or email. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case