PATEL HARESHKUMAR MAGANLAL vs PYARJI IMRANBHAI — 1763/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM080020232025

Filing Number

1763/2025

Filing Date

29-Dec-2025

Registration No

1763/2025

Registration Date

29-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATEL HARESHKUMAR MAGANLAL

    Adv. V M SOLANKI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PYARJI IMRANBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petitioner's plea for restoration of a suit and rejected the request to recover costs from the defendant. The judgment was delivered on 17/03/2025 by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Dhoraji, finding no merit in the petitioner's application to reinstate proceedings that had been previously terminated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1763/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petitioner's plea for restoration of a suit and rejected the request to recover costs from the defendant. The judgment was delivered on 17/03/2025 by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Dhoraji, finding no merit in the petitioner's application to reinstate proceedings that had been previously terminated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case