GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs AMITKUMAR @ GEMO LAXMANBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - D G PESHRANA — 1639/2023
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,81,83,116(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM080019382023
Filing Number
1639/2023
Filing Date
21-10-2023
Registration No
1639/2023
Registration Date
21-10-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
384
Police Station
RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AMITKUMAR @ GEMO LAXMANBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - D G PESHRANA
SANJAY @ BHEDI VIKRAMSINH CHAUHAN
RAVIKUMAR @VMULLO LAXMANBHAI CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 02-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court accepted the accused's voluntary guilty plea to charges under the Prohibition Act and imposed a sentence of imprisonment until the rising of the court plus a fine of Rs. 300 each on the three accused. The court found the guilty plea valid and lawful, imposing the minimum prescribed punishment while noting the accused's voluntary confession without seeking legal mitigation benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court accepted the accused's voluntary guilty plea to charges under the Prohibition Act and imposed a sentence of imprisonment until the rising of the court plus a fine of Rs. 300 each on the three accused. The court found the guilty plea valid and lawful, imposing the minimum prescribed punishment while noting the accused's voluntary confession without seeking legal mitigation benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts