GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SANJAYBHAI BABUBHAI KOLI Advocate - A D PATEL — 1146/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65A,65E,98(2),81,116B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM080013262025
Filing Number
1146/2025
Filing Date
17-10-2025
Registration No
1146/2025
Registration Date
17-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11207055250572
Police Station
RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SANJAYBHAI BABUBHAI KOLI Advocate - A D PATEL
SANJAYKUMAR PARVATSINH RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 05-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC/1146/2025 The court acquitted both accused Sanjaybhai Babubhai Koli and Sanjaykumar Parvatsinh Rathod of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65-A, 65-E, 116, 98-2, 81) for alleged illegal possession of liquor worth ₹3,71,048. The prosecution failed to prove its case because the panch witnesses turned hostile and did not corroborate the recovery panchnama, while police witnesses alone could not establish that the liquor was recovered from the accused at the alleged location in Sevaniya Chaukadi, Dahod. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC/1146/2025 The court acquitted both accused Sanjaybhai Babubhai Koli and Sanjaykumar Parvatsinh Rathod of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65-A, 65-E, 116, 98-2, 81) for alleged illegal possession of liquor worth ₹3,71,048. The prosecution failed to prove its case because the panch witnesses turned hostile and did not corroborate the recovery panchnama, while police witnesses alone could not establish that the liquor was recovered from the accused at the alleged location in Sevaniya Chaukadi, Dahod. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts