GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs JIMALABHAI KHUMANBHAI RATHVA Advocate - V M SOLANKI — 1073/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),117(2),352. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM080012282025
Filing Number
1073/2025
Filing Date
11-Aug-2025
Registration No
1073/2025
Registration Date
11-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
356
Police Station
RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JIMALABHAI KHUMANBHAI RATHVA Advocate - V M SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Judegement
The court acquitted the accused Jimalabhai Khumanbhai Rathva of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 117(2), 352, and IPC Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the evidence and witness testimonies presented by the petitioner (Government of Gujarat) were insufficient to establish the guilt of the accused, leading to a complete acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1073/2025
The court acquitted the accused Jimalabhai Khumanbhai Rathva of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 117(2), 352, and IPC Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the evidence and witness testimonies presented by the petitioner (Government of Gujarat) were insufficient to establish the guilt of the accused, leading to a complete acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts