GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KARANSINH ARJUNSINH JADAV Advocate - C L PARMAR — 971/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM080011232025
Filing Number
971/2025
Filing Date
06-08-2025
Registration No
971/2025
Registration Date
06-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
153
Police Station
RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KARANSINH ARJUNSINH JADAV Advocate - C L PARMAR
SHANTABEN ARJUNSINH JADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 05-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC NO. 971/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted both accused (Karansinh Arjunsinh Jadav and Shantaben Arjunsinh Jadav) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, 114, and IPC Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged assault and abetment charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence and witness testimony that failed to establish the accused's guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC NO. 971/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted both accused (Karansinh Arjunsinh Jadav and Shantaben Arjunsinh Jadav) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, 114, and IPC Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged assault and abetment charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence and witness testimony that failed to establish the accused's guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts