SURYABEN D/O BHARATBHAI NAYAKA W/O HITESHBHAI MOHANBHAI vs NAYAKA HITESHBHAI MOHANBHAI — 124/2025
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLN - JMFC
CNR: GJPM080010802025
Filing Number
124/2025
Filing Date
02-Aug-2025
Registration No
124/2025
Registration Date
02-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURYABEN D/O BHARATBHAI NAYAKA W/O HITESHBHAI MOHANBHAI
Adv. V M SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAYAKA HITESHBHAI MOHANBHAI
-
2.NAYAKA MOHANBHAI JESINGBHAI
-
3.NAYAKA AMBABEN MOHANBHAI
-
4.NAYAKA CHETANBHAI MOHANBHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Order
The court dismissed the petition filed under Section 08, finding that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for the relief sought. The court noted that the case lacked merit and the petitioner's claims could not be substantiated through the proceedings presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Apr-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Feb-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Jan-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Jan-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Dec-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Dec-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 124/2025
The court dismissed the petition filed under Section 08, finding that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for the relief sought. The court noted that the case lacked merit and the petitioner's claims could not be substantiated through the proceedings presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts