GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAKESHBHAI SABURBHAI SALAT Advocate - D G PESHRANA — 879/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65A,65E,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM080010232025
Filing Number
879/2025
Filing Date
29-07-2025
Registration No
879/2025
Registration Date
29-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAKESHBHAI SABURBHAI SALAT Advocate - D G PESHRANA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 20-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC/879/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ghoghamba acquitted accused Rakeshbhai Saburbhai Salat of illegal liquor possession charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 65-A, 65-E, and 98-2 for insufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish its case because the panch (witness) signatories to the seizure panchnama (formal record) turned hostile and did not corroborate the recovery facts. The investigating officer's deposition also lacked concrete evidence proving liquor was found from the accused at Rajgarh Chaukadi. The court found that reliance solely on police witnesses without independent witness corroboration, combined with the panchas' non-support, rendered the muddamal (seized goods) recovery doubtful and unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC/879/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ghoghamba acquitted accused Rakeshbhai Saburbhai Salat of illegal liquor possession charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 65-A, 65-E, and 98-2 for insufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish its case because the panch (witness) signatories to the seizure panchnama (formal record) turned hostile and did not corroborate the recovery facts. The investigating officer's deposition also lacked concrete evidence proving liquor was found from the accused at Rajgarh Chaukadi. The court found that reliance solely on police witnesses without independent witness corroboration, combined with the panchas' non-support, rendered the muddamal (seized goods) recovery doubtful and unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts