GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs TINABHAI KADVABHAI RATHVA Advocate - D G PESHRANA — 406/2024
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,81,83116(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM080004882024
Filing Number
406/2024
Filing Date
22-03-2024
Registration No
406/2024
Registration Date
22-03-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
384
Police Station
RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
TINABHAI KADVABHAI RATHVA Advocate - D G PESHRANA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 02-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt under Sections 65(A)(e), 81, 83, and 116(B) of the Prohibition Act and imposed a fine of ₹100 with an alternate imprisonment of one day. The court noted that although confession is not mandatory, the accused's voluntary admission coupled with sufficient grounds warranted conviction, and the court exercised its discretion to impose punishment less than the minimum prescribed sentence based on the precedent established in the State of Gujarat v. Natwarla case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt under Sections 65(A)(e), 81, 83, and 116(B) of the Prohibition Act and imposed a fine of ₹100 with an alternate imprisonment of one day. The court noted that although confession is not mandatory, the accused's voluntary admission coupled with sufficient grounds warranted conviction, and the court exercised its discretion to impose punishment less than the minimum prescribed sentence based on the precedent established in the State of Gujarat v. Natwarla case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts