GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SHAKTIKUMAR GAMABHAI NAYAK Advocate - M J VYAS — 173/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 74,115(2),351(2)(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM080002222025

Case disposed

Filing Number

173/2025

Filing Date

18-02-2025

Registration No

173/2025

Registration Date

18-02-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

647

Police Station

RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 74,115(2),351(2)(3)

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. M M PARMAR

Respondent(s)

SHAKTIKUMAR GAMABHAI NAYAK Advocate - M J VYAS

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

30-04-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

15-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Case 173/2025 The court acquitted accused Shaktikumar Gamabhai Nayak of charges under IPC Sections 74, 115(2), 351(2)(3), and 54 related to assault and criminal intimidation. The court found insufficient evidence to establish that the accused caused physical injury or made threats to the informant during an incident in a field, as the prosecution failed to produce corroborating witness testimony or medical evidence supporting the complainant's allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 173/2025 The court acquitted accused Shaktikumar Gamabhai Nayak of charges under IPC Sections 74, 115(2), 351(2)(3), and 54 related to assault and criminal intimidation. The court found insufficient evidence to establish that the accused caused physical injury or made threats to the informant during an incident in a field, as the prosecution failed to produce corroborating witness testimony or medical evidence supporting the complainant's allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case