GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs NILESHBHAI SARJANBHAI DAMOR — 81/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),65(E),98(2),116(B),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM080001232026

Case disposed

Filing Number

81/2026

Filing Date

03-02-2026

Registration No

81/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

701

Police Station

RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),65(E),98(2),116(B),81

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NILESHBHAI SARJANBHAI DAMOR

VISHNUBHAI ARVINDBHAI RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

10-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

06-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

04-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

17-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case 81/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ghoghamba acquitted both accused—Nileshbhai Sarjanbhai Damor and Vishnubhai Arvindbhai Rathod—under Section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code for lack of sufficient evidence in the liquor prohibition case. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove that 1,000 bottles of Indian-made whiskey (valued at ₹2,80,500) and a Tata pickup truck (₹50,000) recovered from Bariya-Ghoghamba road belonged to the accused. The panch (witness) signatures on the seizure panchnama were accepted, but both witnesses turned hostile and did not support the recovery facts. The investigating officer's testimony also failed to establish concrete evidence linking the confiscated liquor to the accused. The court found the accused's alleged possession of the muddamal (contraband) doubtful due to insufficient corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 81/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ghoghamba acquitted both accused—Nileshbhai Sarjanbhai Damor and Vishnubhai Arvindbhai Rathod—under Section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code for lack of sufficient evidence in the liquor prohibition case. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove that 1,000 bottles of Indian-made whiskey (valued at ₹2,80,500) and a Tata pickup truck (₹50,000) recovered from Bariya-Ghoghamba road belonged to the accused. The panch (witness) signatures on the seizure panchnama were accepted, but both witnesses turned hostile and did not support the recovery facts. The investigating officer's testimony also failed to establish concrete evidence linking the confiscated liquor to the accused. The court found the accused's alleged possession of the muddamal (contraband) doubtful due to insufficient corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case