GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs NILESHBHAI SARJANBHAI DAMOR — 81/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),65(E),98(2),116(B),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM080001232026
Filing Number
81/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Registration No
81/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GHOGHMBA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
701
Police Station
RAJGADH POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NILESHBHAI SARJANBHAI DAMOR
VISHNUBHAI ARVINDBHAI RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 17-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 81/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ghoghamba acquitted both accused—Nileshbhai Sarjanbhai Damor and Vishnubhai Arvindbhai Rathod—under Section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code for lack of sufficient evidence in the liquor prohibition case. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove that 1,000 bottles of Indian-made whiskey (valued at ₹2,80,500) and a Tata pickup truck (₹50,000) recovered from Bariya-Ghoghamba road belonged to the accused. The panch (witness) signatures on the seizure panchnama were accepted, but both witnesses turned hostile and did not support the recovery facts. The investigating officer's testimony also failed to establish concrete evidence linking the confiscated liquor to the accused. The court found the accused's alleged possession of the muddamal (contraband) doubtful due to insufficient corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 81/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ghoghamba acquitted both accused—Nileshbhai Sarjanbhai Damor and Vishnubhai Arvindbhai Rathod—under Section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code for lack of sufficient evidence in the liquor prohibition case. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove that 1,000 bottles of Indian-made whiskey (valued at ₹2,80,500) and a Tata pickup truck (₹50,000) recovered from Bariya-Ghoghamba road belonged to the accused. The panch (witness) signatures on the seizure panchnama were accepted, but both witnesses turned hostile and did not support the recovery facts. The investigating officer's testimony also failed to establish concrete evidence linking the confiscated liquor to the accused. The court found the accused's alleged possession of the muddamal (contraband) doubtful due to insufficient corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts