RATHVA MAGIBEN D/O NAVALSINH AND W/O RATHVA GANAPATBHAI DARSINGBHAI vs RATHVA GANAPATBHAI DARSINGBHAI Advocate - S D BARIA — 90/2024

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRMA J-63

CNR: GJPM070006082024

Filing Number

90/2024

Filing Date

18-Dec-2024

Registration No

90/2024

Registration Date

18-Dec-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMBUGHODA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RATHVA MAGIBEN D/O NAVALSINH AND W/O RATHVA GANAPATBHAI DARSINGBHAI

    Adv. A L BARIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATHVA GANAPATBHAI DARSINGBHAI Advocate - S D BARIA

  2. 2.RATHVA DARSINGBHAI BHAILALBHAI

  3. 3.RATHVA CHANCHIBEN DARSINGBHAI

  4. 4.RATHVA KALPESHBHAI DARSINGBHAI

  5. 5.RATHVA SUREKHABEN KALPESHBHAI

  6. 6.RATHVA BINIKABEN KALPESHBHAI

  7. 7.RATHVA PINKALBEN KALPESHBHAI

  8. 8.RATHVA JIGNESHBHAI KALPESHBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Jambughoda First Class Magistrate's court dismissed the petition filed by Rathva Magiben against her husband Rathva Ganapatbhai Darsingbhai. The court found the petition to be without merit and ruled that it cannot be proceeded with further. No order was made regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 10-Oct-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 03-Oct-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 12-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 08-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 22-Aug-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 18-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 04-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 20-Jun-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 06-Jun-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 23-May-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 09-May-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 25-Apr-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 11-Apr-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 04-Apr-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 13-Mar-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 03-Mar-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 11-Feb-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 18-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 18-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Jambughoda First Class Magistrate's court dismissed the petition filed by Rathva Magiben against her husband Rathva Ganapatbhai Darsingbhai. The court found the petition to be without merit and ruled that it cannot be proceeded with further. No order was made regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case