GOPALBHAI FULABHAI BARIA vs MANIBEN DHIRABHAI BARIA Advocate - S S TADVI — 124/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,37. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJPM050018142023

Case disposed

Filing Number

124/2023

Filing Date

07-12-2023

Registration No

124/2023

Registration Date

07-12-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,37

Petitioner(s)

GOPALBHAI FULABHAI BARIA

Adv. J K SHAH

Respondent(s)

MANIBEN DHIRABHAI BARIA Advocate - S S TADVI

BADHARSINH KALABHAI BARIA

Adv. S S TADAVI

RATANSINH KALABHAI BARIA

PARVATSINH AAMIDBHAI DHIRABHAI BARIA

JUVANSINH AAMIDBHAI DHIRABHAI BARIA

BHUPATSINH AAMIDBHAI DHIRABHAI BARIA

RAJLIBEN AAMIDBHAI DHIRABHAI BARIA

SHANTABEN AAMIDBHAI DHIRABHAI BARIA

RAMANBHAI NATHABHAI BARIA

MANGLIBEN NATHABHAI BARIA

DINESHBHAI NATHABHAI BARIA

RAMESHBHAI JESHINGBHAI BARIA

PARVATIBEN JESHINGBHAI BARIA

GANPATBHAI JESHINGBHAI BARIA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

30-04-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

15-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

25-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

16-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 124/2023 Court Decision: The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Shahera, Gujarat ALLOWS the plaintiffs' claim and grants them ownership rights over the agricultural land in dispute. The court directs that the respondents' names be registered as co-holders in the land records alongside the plaintiffs' fathers' heritage shares, and orders respondents to bear all case expenses and restitution costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 124/2023 Court Decision: The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Shahera, Gujarat ALLOWS the plaintiffs' claim and grants them ownership rights over the agricultural land in dispute. The court directs that the respondents' names be registered as co-holders in the land records alongside the plaintiffs' fathers' heritage shares, and orders respondents to bear all case expenses and restitution costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case