GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SAMATSINH KALUBHAI PAGI Advocate - R U PAGI — 1201/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 08th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM050016142025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1201/2025

Filing Date

16-10-2025

Registration No

1201/2025

Registration Date

16-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

0462

Police Station

SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SAMATSINH KALUBHAI PAGI Advocate - R U PAGI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

08-05-2026

Disposed

02-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

17-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

01-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

08-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CC No. 1201/2025 The court acquitted Samantsinh Kalubhai Pagi of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove its case due to critical evidentiary gaps: panch witnesses turned hostile and denied IMFL seizure, no documentary proof of property ownership was produced, no forensic report confirmed the seized liquor's authenticity, and no independent witnesses from the locality testified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 1201/2025 The court acquitted Samantsinh Kalubhai Pagi of charges under Section 65AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove its case due to critical evidentiary gaps: panch witnesses turned hostile and denied IMFL seizure, no documentary proof of property ownership was produced, no forensic report confirmed the seized liquor's authenticity, and no independent witnesses from the locality testified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case