GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs AMARSINH LALABHAI BARIA — 969/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM050013082025
Filing Number
969/2025
Filing Date
02-Sep-2025
Registration No
969/2025
Registration Date
02-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA
Judge
1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
393
Police Station
SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMARSINH LALABHAI BARIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 969/2025 The court convicted Amarsinh Lalabhai Baria under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), after he voluntarily confessed to the offense. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with one day's simple imprisonment as the alternative if the fine remained unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 969/2025
Summary of Case 969/2025 The court convicted Amarsinh Lalabhai Baria under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), after he voluntarily confessed to the offense. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with one day's simple imprisonment as the alternative if the fine remained unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts